733 N. Capitol Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana

Developer: Jeff Sparks

Architect: Yeah, right.

Nick from Indianapolis writes . . .

I just stumbled onto your site today, I love how you rip into the poorly designed and shitty developments Seattle will have to look at for decades to come. Sorry for that. I thought you might be comforted to know that you are not alone in your suffering. Here in Indianapolis, we’ve had our fair share of shit developments as of late. Below is a link to the hands-down winner for Cheap Shit Condos: Indy Edition. The design wasn’t great to begin with, very bland and cookie-cutter. When the economy tanked the developer cut so many corners–literally and figuratively–that it has been declared uninhabitable by the fire marshal. That was after the 30+ zoning, building and design violations noted by city inspectors. Look and learn:

http://www.urbanindy.com/2010/09/28/from-sketches-to-shovel-how-the-de-rimini-fails/


http://www.urbanindy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/di_rimini_1_lg.jpg

DiRimini front view:

Recession cutback #1:  No more windows! NO MORE WINDOWS!!  Recession cutback #2: Stack cardboard boxes, call it a condo. Recession cutback #3: Paint tiny black mourning shutters next to the windows to commemorate the worst condo project this side of the Mississippi River.

http://www.urbanindy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/di_rimini_2_lg.jpg

DiRimini side view.

Dumpster diving takes on a new meaning with the right-side high dive platform.  Parcours aficionados, take note.

http://www.urbanindy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/di_rimini_3_lg.jpg

…and the back of the building.

Prison exercise yard, complete with Juliette balconies and somber black doors.

We were hopeful about a happy re-purposing of this hideous eave-less, micro-shutter pile of boxes . . . but we must confess that a tear down seems the best option.  We love ourselves a good roller rink, indoor mini golf or big doggy run, but this ugliness cannot be overcome.  We vote to tear down, or plant some super aggressive vine to cover it.  Here in Seattle, the blackberries could swallow it in short order.

In the meantime we’d rename this condo DiChernobyl Heights.

15821 Leary Way NE
Redmond, WA

Developer: Roger Nix/ on the lam

Architect: unavailable/embarrassed

AMBER ALERT!!!

Condominium developer Roger Nix has gone missing.

Last known whereabouts: building new condominium complexes so cheap that units are falling apart only a few years after construction.

Last seen: dissolving his LLC and running away with the profits, leaving residents stranded with huge repair costs and no legal recourse.

Purported to be: in Mexico or the Caribbean with suitcases full of money.

So you might be asking, “Where was the oversight on this project?”

Well, it turns out the city inspected the building before it was completed, and clearly before they started growing Kombucha on the walls. We’d like to point out to all aspiring builders, waterproof everything is essential in the Northwest. For God’s sake, look out the window. It’s raining.

Clearly, the worst part of this whole situation is that good people got stuck with an irreparable money pit that ended up being literally poisonous to live in.

The rest of us get to look at this sponge-paint, rice-cake, faux-plywood, rectangle-of-a-low-slung, small-windowed shoe box. That brown wood above the doors isn’t repair in progress, but rather “accent” coloring. We at CSC vote that in five years they pop this thing onto a double wide, and move it to Aurora Avenue to join the other run down hotels.

Photo: Seattle Times

737 Olive Way, Seattle, WA

Developer: RC Hedreen

Architect: Mulvanny G2

Cheapshitcondos had a tour of the soon to be auctioned Olive 8 condominiums.

We were lured by the offer of “an enviable lifestyle on your own terms.” Enticingly, our own terms were to be auctioned with a starting bid of $160,000. Now that’s a cheap seat! Perusing the fine print, we were perplexed to learn that each property has “an unpublished reserve price” which is not the starting bid. This left us wondering, just what is the starting bid? Oh right, it’s the bait.

We had a good look around the 27th floor, admiring the views which can be spectacular, unless you happen to be kissing distance from Ma Bell’s telephone tower to the left.

We viewed units with square footage from about 650 to 1200 sq. ft., but were surreptitiously warned in the fine print that “square footages. . . may vary and are approximations only, based on the most accurate information available.” We were at once reassured that we know five hundred square feet when we see it, but certainly alarmed that the people trusted with building a high-rise could not successfully wrangle a tape measure. The most startling clause in the fine print stated that “models throughout this brochure do not reflect racial preference.” There weren’t any people in the brochure. WTF?

The largest corner units were spacious with grand views and imposing marble kitchen islands. However, the smallest units might require a regular regiment of Prozac to deal with feelings of confinement, windowless bedrooms and a mind-boggling waste of space particularly in the overlarge half bathrooms by the front door. Really, what are you going to do in there?

This condo is miles better than the worst offenders, holding LEED Silver Certification and a prime downtown location, yet it’s going on auction. Economy? Yes. Uninspired mediocre designs trading on views? Yes. It could have been so much better.

The building does have a nice nighttime mood ring on the roof line. Red, stressed. Blue, Prozac. Green . . .

201 Howard St. SE Atlanta, GA

Architect: Rutledge-Alcock

Developer: Corrugated-Multi-Colored-Metal-Tool Sheds/Condos Inc.

JP Peterson from Atlanta, Georgia writes:

I came across your site and thought I share your pain a bit. This is “BLDG 1″ (denoted by the $.69 stick on letters, center, between the brick and Hardie plank, lower 1/3 center) of SoHo, in Atlanta’s Kirkwood neighborhood. This is the view from the porch swing of our 1923 bungalow. Sunday I’m going to the open house and I’m going to straighten that cheap paper lamp in the model unit’s window (center right).

Let’s enumerate the facade materials:

1. Assorted silver tone metal. Aluminum doors and windows, silver painted railings, raw galvanized drip edge.

2. Beige concrete block. Left end unit facade.

3. Beige Stucco. Between the windows, in the setbacks, three of the six stair planters

4. Shit brown bricks. At the foundation line (except the concrete block unit), between the lower windows (like a toothy grin on a Jack o’ Lantern), the remaining three stair planters.

5. Shit brown plywood. The whimsical inverted dorsal fins that divide the balconies, the frieze and facia.

6. Chartreuse Hardie Plank. In profusion.

7. Raw concrete stairs

8. Beige painted wood. Balcony edges, assorted trim.

9. (unseen in photo) Shit brown sheet metal. Garage and entrance doors around the back

Special features:

1. None of the windows open.

2. The upper right balcony is dead space, the “loft” interior makes it unreachable


I included a street shot too, just so you could get a feel for how well this blends in with the architecture of its 90-110 year old neighbors.

What, the windows don’t open?!? Don’t the good people of Georgia like fresh air?

This building is new and it already looks morose and severe, like a grouchy, grabby boss in a mustard colored suit who tells you to come in on Saturday and takes up too much space.

We at CSC are still laughing…sympathy to the neighbors…we understand.

Cheapshitcondos received an email asking for some feedback on a condo project slated to begin construction later this year just outside of Boston, Massachusetts. Included are some design elevations. Please include your own comments too…

I came across your website, and I agree with your observations. I am designing a condo project here in Massachusetts, and was wondering if you wouldn’t mind critiquing it for me.
I am getting these condos approved in Lynn, Mass. It is a lower income city 11 miles north of Boston, Mass.
I am building 4 buildings, each with 36 or 38 units. I would love your thoughts, keep in mind that these condos are going to sell for $119,900 to $189,900 in a very high priced region of the country.

Thank you very much, Dave Potter


With regard to appearances we feel the building is getting too multiple-colored and has smallish windows.
Large windows make people happier.
We appreciate the relatively simple shape of the building which avoids the cobbled together bargain shed and shipping container look. It’s just our opinion, but for a nice sense of symmetry
we feel the domed windows on the roof line could be repeated on the other side too, if possible. We also hope the units will have tall ceilings.
Tall ceilings make people happier.

Lastly, we would like to see these building able to change shape into a free-standing robot, à la Transformers, which would make everyone happier.

Best,

Cheapshitcondos