07
Sep
752 Bellevue Ave E
Developer: Urban Seattle LLC
Architect: Urban Seattle LLC
Send us photos of cheapshit condos from your neighborhood.
and...
cheapshitcondos.com
The new urban blandscape sweeping through Seattle
Send us photos of cheapshit condos from your neighborhood.
WE LOVE MONEY!
September 8th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
You cannot think that this meaningless crap-blog with AdSense account is going to make you enough money to be worth the time you obsess on other people’s attempt to conduct real business with real meaning and value.
Maybe you’re going for the pitty affiliate click … and maybe that works. Because I feel so sorry for your lame efforts I’m going to click on the Loft42 ad served by Google … because that’s a cool condo project in W. Seattle. I hope you enjoy the .20 … why don’t you invest it in hiring somebody with talent to produce meaningful content. Actually … maybe you should just take pictures of your poo and post that. I truly think you’d be good at that and could probably scheme your way to a decent living.
-Concerned Observer who watch MODE sell all 36 units within a year to happy, proud owners.
PS – I can actually see stink waves coming off the screen from your shithouse blog.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Yeah for controversy! I want my HBO . . . and love the fact that some funny pictures of condos that need design help could possibly inspire a little more consideration for quality design and construction. I think it is hard to argue that some condos in Seattle (and many other cities) are not hilariously baaaaaad.
September 9th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Great website and keep it up with these shit condos. And looks like one of the “happy, proud” owners of piece of Mode decided to comment anonymously
September 13th, 2009 at 9:02 pm
I see this area is famous for cheap shit condos: right across the street is the Bellagio Condominiums.
September 14th, 2009 at 10:25 am
re:Anonymous
“stink waves coming off the screen”
Don’t you think that is a little harsh? Did one of the writers from Hanna Montana invest in this project?
September 21st, 2009 at 10:53 am
Really anon!? We aren’t allowed to comment on and critique art/architecture/etc. If you don’t like hearing or reading the opinions of others, what makes you think that other people would be interested in your opinion, notably when you aren’t even willing to put a name on your complaint?
Seriously, do ANY of the architectural atrocities in this blog deserve the defense you are providing? As a community we would be remiss to not pay attention to and point out any horrible affront to society and civilization
October 10th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
The only “stink waves” I see are coming off that atrocity pictured at the top of the page. Ack!
Although I suppose it’s better than the no-tell motel it replaced . . .
October 10th, 2009 at 10:23 pm
Mental note to anonymous- Never bolster your argument with a poo comment.
And yes, this building stinks.
October 11th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Pig Pile on anonymous! Might I suggest right in the parking lot in front of this place.
October 12th, 2009 at 2:17 am
Note to buyers of this condo. I spent time there when it was a crappy dumpola of an ex-motel. Its inhabitants included white trash hos, and the dumbest pot growers I’ve ever known. Woke up hungover one morning to see a dildo in the pool. Those are memories that last a lifetime. This place is classic. Stare at your neighbors when you walk out the door. It is in a decent neighborhood these days. Better buy the parking space, because you will NEVER find street parking around there.
November 9th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Hmmmmm….one has to wonder if “Anonymous” is affiliated with Urban Seattle LLC……
December 7th, 2009 at 10:35 am
I would like to think of myself as a connoisseur of architecture but site give no insight or constructive criticism. Keep renting, complaining, and proving you dont know shit about much.
December 24th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
I like this one…. I thought the design was nice especially since it was just a rennovation and not a new build.
January 8th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
Happy, proud owners? Well, OK, but you left off the following appropriate adjectives: gullible, clueless and blind.
April 8th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
Although it is hard to tell about the real quality of some of these
projects from the often poor photographs (and with no floor plan),
I think this is a relatively attractive and creative renovation of an existing building for a new
use. Some of the criticisms on this site make me think that the writer
has no concept of the economic realities of building. The reason
many older buildings are nicer is because people were working for
a few dollars a day and much of the great architecture of today is
buildings with enormous budgets. And when the Rev lashed out at the Opal
Condominiums I realized that there are always people who will never be happy (and who probably haven’t the foggiest idea of the exhausting effort it takes to get a building of
any quality at all built.) All that being said, I will admit that most of the buildings on this site are truly awful.
June 1st, 2010 at 11:07 am
The outsides are awful. Inside it’s hard to see paying $200,000 for 468 sq feet. They must be smoking crack